Wednesday, September 9, 2009

The Scoop on Snopes...

Snopes--Eye Opener - read below so you will know

For the past few =2 0 years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com.
Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara M ikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity with many believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the pa st couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation?
The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues.
A few months ago, State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's claim to have researched this issue before =2 0 posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers – and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet, snopes.com issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things - not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose driven agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative.
There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings.

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts...'proceed with caution.' Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Remember, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their 'not' fully looking into things.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com
I have found this to be true also! Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False...... Then they gave their Liberal slant....!!! I have suspected some problems with snopes for s ome time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder. www.truthorfiction.com is a far a better source for verification, in my opinion.
This couple are is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to Youtube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not... trust Snopes.com ever for anything that is remotely political! I don't even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore. So goes modern journalism. There are cropping up numerous sites and blogs that openly challenging Snopes's findings, opinions, and outright claims.


A few conservative speakers on Myspace told me about Snopes a few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. Well, I found out for myself that it is true. Anyway So you might consider thinking twice before relying on for Snopes.com for fact checking and so your friends the courtesy of tipping them off to Snopes political slant.
Many people still think Snopes.com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual.
We need to make sure everyone is aware that... that is a hoax in itself.

15 comments:

Janet said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
elaine said...

For the past few =2 0 years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, ".....


I don't really think that was a typo--just a bit of html coding that got put in by mistake. I believe the "=20" was meant to be a space

Anonymous said...

Is it possible that you, too, are an "individual" who wants to set the record straight? How can we believe you anymore than we can believe Snopes? I believe nothing on the Web until I have proved it for myself.

By the way -- you used the wrong "to" in your headline. Just thought I'd point that out.

Dennis Gittinger said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ArtChee said...

POT calling the KETTLE black....

Mark Ploch said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

You can tell Snopes is biased from their analysis. It's always very slanted. When you read all the way through, a lot of what they say is false is actually true except for some miniscule thing no one cares about. Or they try to give excuses for the Democrats. They don't have any credibility anymore.

Unknown said...

TOO in the headline is correct

Anonymous said...

I see the author deletes comments quite a lot. Could it be people are questioning the author's bias. I wonder if the author is tea party Republican?

Anonymous said...

Dont like the message, shoot the messenger.

Dont like the news, turn the channel till you do.

Nothing out there is without skepticism.

We will never be free until money is removed from politics.

Anonymous said...

I agree one hundred percent. Snopes may not be affiliated with George Soros, and honestly I wish folks would quit hyping it. Just state the facts, prove the truth. There's no need to make up falsehoods. Just read their articles when it comes to libs getting slammed vs. conservatives. It is to blatantly biased towards liberals it isn't even funny. I personally have written to them about their bias. Guess what, they won't respond when you provide the evidence. I suspect that snopes will quietly fade away, or become absorbed by Huffington or moveon.org or another liberal outfit. Oh, if I mispelled something, or made a typo please forgive me, since I'm obviously ignorant because I've made a mistake.

Anonymous said...

Not that it matters, but the "too" in the headline should be "to". "Too" means "also".

Anonymous said...

the headline is correct dolts...if you're going to pick on him about his grammar make sure you have it correct before you do!!! "too" potrays the idea of in excess or more than it should be,as well as meaning also

Anonymous said...

Most info on Snopes is just basic common sense. But then again, reality has a well-known liberal bias.

Anonymous said...

You read this site,,and expect people to believe what you say???? I laugh at your humor))))))